https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360105 The Tribunal upheld the demand of Rs. 8,33,340/- along with interest but set aside the penalties by allowing the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal by the appellants was disposed of accordingly, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected. The Judicial Member, however, set aside the interest demand on the ground of limitation, leading to a difference of opinion on this issue. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360105 The Tribunal upheld the demand of Rs. 8,33,340/- along with interest but set aside the penalties by allowing the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal by the appellants was disposed of accordingly, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected. The Judicial Member, however, set aside the interest demand on the ground of limitation, leading to a difference of opinion on this issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360105