<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 666 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360102</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to ascertain whether the appellants had availed and utilized inadmissible credit during the disputed period. The original authority was directed to verify this fact and decide on the penalty after allowing the appellant to provide supporting documents. This decision aimed to clarify the disputed material fact for a fair determination of the penalty based on the utilization of inadmissible credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 06:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 666 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360102</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to ascertain whether the appellants had availed and utilized inadmissible credit during the disputed period. The original authority was directed to verify this fact and decide on the penalty after allowing the appellant to provide supporting documents. This decision aimed to clarify the disputed material fact for a fair determination of the penalty based on the utilization of inadmissible credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>