<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 665 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360101</link>
    <description>Notification-based exemption was held available where the earlier concessional notification had ceased to operate, and the appellant&#039;s credit position was found to be revenue neutral because the credit was either utilised for duty payment or reversed. On that basis, the demand of differential duty and interest was not sustainable. Penalty was also found unwarranted because the lapse was treated as a bona fide mistake arising from continued reliance on the earlier concessional regime, so the penal consequence was set aside. The impugned order was accordingly set aside and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 665 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360101</link>
      <description>Notification-based exemption was held available where the earlier concessional notification had ceased to operate, and the appellant&#039;s credit position was found to be revenue neutral because the credit was either utilised for duty payment or reversed. On that basis, the demand of differential duty and interest was not sustainable. Penalty was also found unwarranted because the lapse was treated as a bona fide mistake arising from continued reliance on the earlier concessional regime, so the penal consequence was set aside. The impugned order was accordingly set aside and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>