<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 16 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12967</link>
    <description>A notice issued under section 158BC before completion of the search under section 132 was not interfered with at the notice stage. The Authority directed supply of the remaining seized documents within ten days and allowed the petitioners thirty days thereafter to file the return, with delay in filing condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 16 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12967</link>
      <description>A notice issued under section 158BC before completion of the search under section 132 was not interfered with at the notice stage. The Authority directed supply of the remaining seized documents within ten days and allowed the petitioners thirty days thereafter to file the return, with delay in filing condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>