<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 15 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12960</link>
    <description>Cash house rent allowance paid under an employment contract forms part of salary for disallowance purposes under section 40A(5) because salary under section 17 is an inclusive definition and such allowance is monetary remuneration for services rendered, not a statutory perquisite. Exhaust fans installed in a textile factory do not qualify for extra-shift allowance as textile machinery because depreciation and related allowances depend on the specific asset&#039;s own classification and separate identity; fan installations remain electrical machinery and are specifically excluded. Both questions were answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 15 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12960</link>
      <description>Cash house rent allowance paid under an employment contract forms part of salary for disallowance purposes under section 40A(5) because salary under section 17 is an inclusive definition and such allowance is monetary remuneration for services rendered, not a statutory perquisite. Exhaust fans installed in a textile factory do not qualify for extra-shift allowance as textile machinery because depreciation and related allowances depend on the specific asset&#039;s own classification and separate identity; fan installations remain electrical machinery and are specifically excluded. Both questions were answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>