<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 637 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360073</link>
    <description>The court resolved various issues related to income tax adjustments, including the treatment of Advance Against Depreciation (AAD) in book profit, provision for leave encashment, excess provisions for bonus, sundry balance, and interest income from HPSEB for deduction under section 80IA. The court relied on established legal precedents to decide on each issue, ultimately disposing of the appeal and any pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 637 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360073</link>
      <description>The court resolved various issues related to income tax adjustments, including the treatment of Advance Against Depreciation (AAD) in book profit, provision for leave encashment, excess provisions for bonus, sundry balance, and interest income from HPSEB for deduction under section 80IA. The court relied on established legal precedents to decide on each issue, ultimately disposing of the appeal and any pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>