<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 636 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360072</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for 60% depreciation on printers as part of the computer system, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The decision was based on consistent findings in previous assessments and the absence of new evidence challenging the factual conclusions. The Court emphasized interpreting the tax statute to give full effect to all words used and favored the assessee in cases of ambiguity, especially regarding depreciation claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 636 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360072</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for 60% depreciation on printers as part of the computer system, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The decision was based on consistent findings in previous assessments and the absence of new evidence challenging the factual conclusions. The Court emphasized interpreting the tax statute to give full effect to all words used and favored the assessee in cases of ambiguity, especially regarding depreciation claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>