https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272589 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD, setting aside the denial of refund for outdoor catering and medical insurance services. The presiding judge found the rejection unjustified, emphasizing the need to establish a direct nexus between input and output services for refund claims. The decision considered previous judgments and the broad definition of input services during the relevant period, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and granting the refund for the disputed services. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2018 08:32:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272589 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD, setting aside the denial of refund for outdoor catering and medical insurance services. The presiding judge found the rejection unjustified, emphasizing the need to establish a direct nexus between input and output services for refund claims. The decision considered previous judgments and the broad definition of input services during the relevant period, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and granting the refund for the disputed services. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272589