<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1646 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the first appellate authority, ruling that the appellant, an exporter, is entitled to claim a refund once every quarter, with the &quot;relevant date&quot; for claiming a refund being the last possible date of exports within the quarter. The judgment clarified the time limitation for refund applications under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and emphasized the entitlement of exporters to claim refunds based on quarterly exports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 08:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1646 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the first appellate authority, ruling that the appellant, an exporter, is entitled to claim a refund once every quarter, with the &quot;relevant date&quot; for claiming a refund being the last possible date of exports within the quarter. The judgment clarified the time limitation for refund applications under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and emphasized the entitlement of exporters to claim refunds based on quarterly exports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>