<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 622 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening under Section 148, finding that the AO had sufficient basis to believe income had escaped assessment. However, the addition of Rs. 4,35,282/- as undisclosed income was set aside for further investigation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper inquiry and evidence beyond reliance on statements, directing the AO to conduct a thorough examination into the transaction in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 08:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 622 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening under Section 148, finding that the AO had sufficient basis to believe income had escaped assessment. However, the addition of Rs. 4,35,282/- as undisclosed income was set aside for further investigation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper inquiry and evidence beyond reliance on statements, directing the AO to conduct a thorough examination into the transaction in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>