<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12954</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the penalty for delayed submission of return due to unsatisfactory explanations provided by the assessee despite multiple extension requests. The Tribunal found no valid reason for the delay beyond the periods covered by the extensions. The penalty levy was deemed correct and in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:11:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12954</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the penalty for delayed submission of return due to unsatisfactory explanations provided by the assessee despite multiple extension requests. The Tribunal found no valid reason for the delay beyond the periods covered by the extensions. The penalty levy was deemed correct and in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>