https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360037 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed based on discrepancies in goods description for availing CENVAT credit. The Tribunal found that the appellant had followed proper procedures in procuring materials and had sufficient documentation to support their claim. Additionally, the Tribunal disagreed with the Adjudicating Authority on the issue of limitation, holding that the demands on the main appellant were unsustainable. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2018 06:11:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360037 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed based on discrepancies in goods description for availing CENVAT credit. The Tribunal found that the appellant had followed proper procedures in procuring materials and had sufficient documentation to support their claim. Additionally, the Tribunal disagreed with the Adjudicating Authority on the issue of limitation, holding that the demands on the main appellant were unsustainable. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360037