https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272582 A claimant who had contracted to purchase an interest in land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act could seek a reference under section 18 when the court was concerned only with determining compensation, because the proceeding had not yet reached apportionment or identification of persons entitled to the compensation money. A person treated by the Collector as a claimant could ask for the reference and support it, while the question of ultimate entitlement to a share in compensation was reserved for a later stage. Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act did not bar locus standi at that stage, and the rejection of the reference was set aside. en-us Wed, 12 Jul 1905 00:00:00 +0521 Tue, 08 May 2018 18:40:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272582 A claimant who had contracted to purchase an interest in land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act could seek a reference under section 18 when the court was concerned only with determining compensation, because the proceeding had not yet reached apportionment or identification of persons entitled to the compensation money. A person treated by the Collector as a claimant could ask for the reference and support it, while the question of ultimate entitlement to a share in compensation was reserved for a later stage. Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act did not bar locus standi at that stage, and the rejection of the reference was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Jul 1905 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272582