<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 229 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272574</link>
    <description>A candidate contesting from another constituency must produce the relevant electoral roll copy or certified entry at scrutiny, and non-production is treated as a mandatory breach justifying rejection of the nomination. The text also states that a published delimitation order has the force of law, while correction of clerical slips or polling-station particulars is permissible; such matters cannot ordinarily be reopened through an election petition outside the grounds recognised by election law. On the facts described, no legally cognizable improper reception or refusal of votes was shown, and no material effect on the result was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 17:12:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 229 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272574</link>
      <description>A candidate contesting from another constituency must produce the relevant electoral roll copy or certified entry at scrutiny, and non-production is treated as a mandatory breach justifying rejection of the nomination. The text also states that a published delimitation order has the force of law, while correction of clerical slips or polling-station particulars is permissible; such matters cannot ordinarily be reopened through an election petition outside the grounds recognised by election law. On the facts described, no legally cognizable improper reception or refusal of votes was shown, and no material effect on the result was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>