<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 63 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12950</link>
    <description>The court held that the second draft order issued by the Income-tax Officer was invalid. The capital gains from the sale of silver utensils were to be assessed as long-term capital gains, as initially proposed, rejecting the ITO&#039;s attempt to change them to short-term capital gains in the second draft order. The court emphasized procedural fairness and the importance of preventing arbitrariness in tax assessments, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:03:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 63 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12950</link>
      <description>The court held that the second draft order issued by the Income-tax Officer was invalid. The capital gains from the sale of silver utensils were to be assessed as long-term capital gains, as initially proposed, rejecting the ITO&#039;s attempt to change them to short-term capital gains in the second draft order. The court emphasized procedural fairness and the importance of preventing arbitrariness in tax assessments, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>