https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272566 The court determined that the vested remainder conveyed by Lakshminarayana Rao's wife under a sale-deed passed to the first defendant. It held that the vested interest in the property was included in the authorization to convey immovable property, allowing the sale to be valid. The court interpreted the sale-deed as conveying the entire interest in the property, including the vested interest, and dismissed the argument that only half the share was sold. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed, with costs awarded against the plaintiff, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2018 13:20:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272566 The court determined that the vested remainder conveyed by Lakshminarayana Rao's wife under a sale-deed passed to the first defendant. It held that the vested interest in the property was included in the authorization to convey immovable property, allowing the sale to be valid. The court interpreted the sale-deed as conveying the entire interest in the property, including the vested interest, and dismissed the argument that only half the share was sold. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed, with costs awarded against the plaintiff, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Mar 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272566