https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272562 The arbitration clause in paragraph XVI of the Sixth Schedule was treated as part of the licence between the State Government and the licensee, and it could bind only those parties unless the Act expressly substituted the Board. Section 76 recognised arbitration between the Board and a licensee only where the statute specifically provided for it, and no provision was shown making a dispute over non-compliance with the Sixth Schedule referable against the Board under paragraph XVI. Section 60 could not be used to treat the Board as the State Government for that purpose. The second proviso to Section 57A could bar a Rating Committee only if the statutory conditions, including a valid paragraph XVI reference, were satisfied; that bar did not apply. en-us Wed, 28 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2018 12:42:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272562 The arbitration clause in paragraph XVI of the Sixth Schedule was treated as part of the licence between the State Government and the licensee, and it could bind only those parties unless the Act expressly substituted the Board. Section 76 recognised arbitration between the Board and a licensee only where the statute specifically provided for it, and no provision was shown making a dispute over non-compliance with the Sixth Schedule referable against the Board under paragraph XVI. Section 60 could not be used to treat the Board as the State Government for that purpose. The second proviso to Section 57A could bar a Rating Committee only if the statutory conditions, including a valid paragraph XVI reference, were satisfied; that bar did not apply. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272562