https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272558 The court upheld the validity of S.R.O. No. 379 under the Cotton Control Order, 1950, regulating the export of cotton to control prices and supply. It was deemed constitutional as it did not adversely affect petitioners. However, S.R.O. No. 388, which restricted merchants from purchasing cotton, was found unconstitutional as it concentrated trade in the hands of monopolists, eliminating opportunities for other merchants. One petition was granted with costs, while the other was dismissed with costs, involving a substantial question of law on the interpretation of constitutional provisions related to trade and commerce. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2018 11:37:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272558 The court upheld the validity of S.R.O. No. 379 under the Cotton Control Order, 1950, regulating the export of cotton to control prices and supply. It was deemed constitutional as it did not adversely affect petitioners. However, S.R.O. No. 388, which restricted merchants from purchasing cotton, was found unconstitutional as it concentrated trade in the hands of monopolists, eliminating opportunities for other merchants. One petition was granted with costs, while the other was dismissed with costs, involving a substantial question of law on the interpretation of constitutional provisions related to trade and commerce. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272558