https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272557 An advocate's right of audience before a tribunal is not an absolute incident of professional qualification; it depends on the statute governing that tribunal, and Article 19(1)(g) does not create a free-standing right to appear in all judicial or quasi-judicial fora. The commentary also explains that a consent-based restriction on representation is not arbitrary discrimination under Article 14 because tribunals are distinct from courts and may follow different procedural rules. On that reasoning, the restriction on appearance before the industrial tribunal was upheld and the constitutional challenge failed. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2018 11:22:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272557 An advocate's right of audience before a tribunal is not an absolute incident of professional qualification; it depends on the statute governing that tribunal, and Article 19(1)(g) does not create a free-standing right to appear in all judicial or quasi-judicial fora. The commentary also explains that a consent-based restriction on representation is not arbitrary discrimination under Article 14 because tribunals are distinct from courts and may follow different procedural rules. On that reasoning, the restriction on appearance before the industrial tribunal was upheld and the constitutional challenge failed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 18 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272557