https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360022 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made on account of unexplained investment in jewellery. The decision highlighted the importance of considering family customs and practices in assessing jewellery possession, referencing relevant case laws. The Tribunal's ruling aligned with previous high court judgments, emphasizing a practical and customary approach to such evaluations. The issue of unexplained investment in property was not extensively discussed in the judgment. en-us Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2026 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360022 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made on account of unexplained investment in jewellery. The decision highlighted the importance of considering family customs and practices in assessing jewellery possession, referencing relevant case laws. The Tribunal's ruling aligned with previous high court judgments, emphasizing a practical and customary approach to such evaluations. The issue of unexplained investment in property was not extensively discussed in the judgment. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360022