https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360010 A recorded settlement or compromise does not, by itself, create contempt liability unless the court order contains a clear undertaking that is wilfully breached and the conduct substantially interferes with the due course of justice. Where the dispute concerns enforcement of settlement terms, the proper course is execution proceedings rather than contempt. The discussion also notes that acceptance of delayed payments with interest, after an initial instalment default, did not justify revival of the winding-up petition on the facts described. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2018 08:04:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360010 A recorded settlement or compromise does not, by itself, create contempt liability unless the court order contains a clear undertaking that is wilfully breached and the conduct substantially interferes with the due course of justice. Where the dispute concerns enforcement of settlement terms, the proper course is execution proceedings rather than contempt. The discussion also notes that acceptance of delayed payments with interest, after an initial instalment default, did not justify revival of the winding-up petition on the facts described. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360010