https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360009 The Appellate Tribunal concluded that the Applicant/Appellant was not eligible to maintain the petition under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013). Additionally, the Applicant/Appellant was found to have misled the Hon'ble Supreme Court by inaccurately stating that the Tribunal had confirmed a 14.017% shareholding, leading to the dismissal of Review Application (AT) No. 01 of 2017 and Company Appeal (AT) No. 22 of 2017 without costs. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2018 08:04:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360009 The Appellate Tribunal concluded that the Applicant/Appellant was not eligible to maintain the petition under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013). Additionally, the Applicant/Appellant was found to have misled the Hon'ble Supreme Court by inaccurately stating that the Tribunal had confirmed a 14.017% shareholding, leading to the dismissal of Review Application (AT) No. 01 of 2017 and Company Appeal (AT) No. 22 of 2017 without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360009