<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 564 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. Recovery of CENVAT credit from the ISD was deemed unsustainable, and the demand was held to be barred by limitation. The Tribunal did not address the eligibility of CENVAT credit on input services, providing relief to the appellant based on recovery and limitation issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 564 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. Recovery of CENVAT credit from the ISD was deemed unsustainable, and the demand was held to be barred by limitation. The Tribunal did not address the eligibility of CENVAT credit on input services, providing relief to the appellant based on recovery and limitation issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>