<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 541 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, finding the respondent compliant with the Central Excise Act. The penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority was deemed unnecessary due to misinterpretation of the Small Scale Exemption Notification. The appeal by the revenue was rejected, and the order was pronounced in court at the conclusion of the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 08:03:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 541 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, finding the respondent compliant with the Central Excise Act. The penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority was deemed unnecessary due to misinterpretation of the Small Scale Exemption Notification. The appeal by the revenue was rejected, and the order was pronounced in court at the conclusion of the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>