https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359975 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellant and the Managing Director, setting aside the penalties imposed on them. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected as the demands were set aside, rendering the appeal moot. The Tribunal held that the appellant had rectified any ineligible CENVAT credit by paying duty on the goods delivered to the other entity, following a Gujarat High Court ruling. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 May 2018 16:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359975 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellant and the Managing Director, setting aside the penalties imposed on them. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected as the demands were set aside, rendering the appeal moot. The Tribunal held that the appellant had rectified any ineligible CENVAT credit by paying duty on the goods delivered to the other entity, following a Gujarat High Court ruling. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359975