<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 531 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359967</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the penalty imposed on the petitioner for non-production of Form-17 acknowledgment, as the assessing officer had verified and certified the Form-17 submission. The Court directed the respondent to reevaluate the claim based on the xerox copies provided and complete the proceedings within one month. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration without costs to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 08:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 531 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359967</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the penalty imposed on the petitioner for non-production of Form-17 acknowledgment, as the assessing officer had verified and certified the Form-17 submission. The Court directed the respondent to reevaluate the claim based on the xerox copies provided and complete the proceedings within one month. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration without costs to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>