https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12939 Whether a trust was specified or unspecified, and whether its beneficiaries and their shares were known and determinate, was treated as a finding of fact and therefore not a referable question of law under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Rajasthan High Court also noted that the remaining proposed questions had already been declined in earlier applications involving the same assessee and the same issues, so it saw no reason to take a different view. The Revenue's request for reference was rejected, and no reference was directed. en-us Thu, 24 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2009 13:53:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12939 Whether a trust was specified or unspecified, and whether its beneficiaries and their shares were known and determinate, was treated as a finding of fact and therefore not a referable question of law under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Rajasthan High Court also noted that the remaining proposed questions had already been declined in earlier applications involving the same assessee and the same issues, so it saw no reason to take a different view. The Revenue's request for reference was rejected, and no reference was directed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 24 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12939