https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272551 The court dismissed the application to set aside the ex-parte decree due to a 1600-day delay, citing lack of valid reasons. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to the law of limitation, the court held that the petitioners' negligence and failure to provide sufficient reasons for the delay warranted upholding the Subordinate Judge's order of dismissal. The court highlighted the petitioners' duty to actively participate in court proceedings and deemed their explanations as lacking bona fide. The civil revision petition was dismissed without costs, and the miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Tue, 01 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2018 19:50:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272551 The court dismissed the application to set aside the ex-parte decree due to a 1600-day delay, citing lack of valid reasons. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to the law of limitation, the court held that the petitioners' negligence and failure to provide sufficient reasons for the delay warranted upholding the Subordinate Judge's order of dismissal. The court highlighted the petitioners' duty to actively participate in court proceedings and deemed their explanations as lacking bona fide. The civil revision petition was dismissed without costs, and the miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272551