<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272553</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals below the enhanced monetary limit under the applicable litigation policy and Board circulars were treated as not maintainable, and the revised limit was applied to pending matters as well. On that basis, and following the cited precedents, the appeals were not examined on merits and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 19:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272553</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals below the enhanced monetary limit under the applicable litigation policy and Board circulars were treated as not maintainable, and the revised limit was applied to pending matters as well. On that basis, and following the cited precedents, the appeals were not examined on merits and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>