<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (12) TMI 39 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272542</link>
    <description>The court held that two separate appeals are necessary under the statutory provisions. It was determined that an appeal against the quantum of a best judgment assessment cannot be combined with an appeal against the refusal of registration when both decisions are included in the same order under section 23(4) of the Income-tax Act. Each party was instructed to bear its own costs, and the judgment was concurred by both judges involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (12) TMI 39 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272542</link>
      <description>The court held that two separate appeals are necessary under the statutory provisions. It was determined that an appeal against the quantum of a best judgment assessment cannot be combined with an appeal against the refusal of registration when both decisions are included in the same order under section 23(4) of the Income-tax Act. Each party was instructed to bear its own costs, and the judgment was concurred by both judges involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>