<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (1) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272541</link>
    <description>Security deposits received from customers under forward contract arrangements were not &quot;borrowed money&quot; for capital computation under Rule 2A of the Second Schedule to the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. Although the amounts were fixed at the assessee&#039;s instance, carried interest, and could be retained or appropriated against contractual breaches or sums due, the transaction did not create the essential lender-borrower relationship. Applied in its commercial sense, the phrase &quot;borrowed money&quot; covered a loan simpliciter, not a deposit made available for business use. The deposits therefore could not be included in the assessee&#039;s capital.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 17:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (1) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272541</link>
      <description>Security deposits received from customers under forward contract arrangements were not &quot;borrowed money&quot; for capital computation under Rule 2A of the Second Schedule to the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. Although the amounts were fixed at the assessee&#039;s instance, carried interest, and could be retained or appropriated against contractual breaches or sums due, the transaction did not create the essential lender-borrower relationship. Applied in its commercial sense, the phrase &quot;borrowed money&quot; covered a loan simpliciter, not a deposit made available for business use. The deposits therefore could not be included in the assessee&#039;s capital.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>