<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 245 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272537</link>
    <description>Failure to maintain a manufacturing account and stock register was treated as a material defect in the books of account, justifying rejection of the account books. However, the defect was viewed as technical on the facts accepted by the Tribunal, and the disclosed turnover was not considered liable to disturbance. The result was that the books could be rejected, but the turnover determined by the Tribunal was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:48:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 245 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272537</link>
      <description>Failure to maintain a manufacturing account and stock register was treated as a material defect in the books of account, justifying rejection of the account books. However, the defect was viewed as technical on the facts accepted by the Tribunal, and the disclosed turnover was not considered liable to disturbance. The result was that the books could be rejected, but the turnover determined by the Tribunal was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>