<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 345 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272534</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the assessee&#039;s revision against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s judgment for the assessment year 1975-76. The turnover was adjusted to 13,50,000 bricks instead of 15,00,000 bricks, and the Tribunal was directed to fix the turnover accordingly. Each party was to bear their own costs, and the order was to be sent to the Tribunal as per Section 11(8) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 345 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272534</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the assessee&#039;s revision against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s judgment for the assessment year 1975-76. The turnover was adjusted to 13,50,000 bricks instead of 15,00,000 bricks, and the Tribunal was directed to fix the turnover accordingly. Each party was to bear their own costs, and the order was to be sent to the Tribunal as per Section 11(8) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>