https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272529 The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal (Civil Appeal No. 1923 of 1972) and allowed the defendants' appeal (Civil Appeal No. 1924 of 1972), resulting in the dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit. The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit due to the explicit provisions in Section 84(3) of the Act, and the plaintiffs had already availed themselves of the statutory remedies. The parties were ordered to bear their own costs throughout the proceedings. en-us Fri, 11 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2018 15:06:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272529 The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal (Civil Appeal No. 1923 of 1972) and allowed the defendants' appeal (Civil Appeal No. 1924 of 1972), resulting in the dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit. The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit due to the explicit provisions in Section 84(3) of the Act, and the plaintiffs had already availed themselves of the statutory remedies. The parties were ordered to bear their own costs throughout the proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 11 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272529