https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272528 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, the defendant, in an action for the recovery of money paid under mistake. The appellant, a temple official, received money orders from a fraudster and was sued by the Governor-General in Council for the amount. Citing legal precedents, the court emphasized the distinction between mistakes of fact and law, ultimately deciding that the appellant was misled by the fraudster's conduct and should not be liable for the loss. The appeal was allowed, and the suit for recovery was dismissed. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2018 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272528 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, the defendant, in an action for the recovery of money paid under mistake. The appellant, a temple official, received money orders from a fraudster and was sued by the Governor-General in Council for the amount. Citing legal precedents, the court emphasized the distinction between mistakes of fact and law, ultimately deciding that the appellant was misled by the fraudster's conduct and should not be liable for the loss. The appeal was allowed, and the suit for recovery was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Jul 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272528