<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 213 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272525</link>
    <description>A non-advocate has no right to appear and plead for another person before the Court, because the right to practise as an advocate belongs exclusively to advocates under the statutory scheme. A party may nevertheless be represented by a pleader in a particular proceeding with the Court&#039;s permission, and that discretion must be exercised with regard to the representative&#039;s antecedents, the party&#039;s need, and the interests of justice. The Court rejected any claim to habitual appearance as a profession by a non-advocate, while recognising limited case-specific permission to avoid denial of justice; permission was granted in the matter described.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 12:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 213 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272525</link>
      <description>A non-advocate has no right to appear and plead for another person before the Court, because the right to practise as an advocate belongs exclusively to advocates under the statutory scheme. A party may nevertheless be represented by a pleader in a particular proceeding with the Court&#039;s permission, and that discretion must be exercised with regard to the representative&#039;s antecedents, the party&#039;s need, and the interests of justice. The Court rejected any claim to habitual appearance as a profession by a non-advocate, while recognising limited case-specific permission to avoid denial of justice; permission was granted in the matter described.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>