https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272521 A non-advocate power-of-attorney holder has no general right to appear, plead and argue for principals, because Order 3 CPC permits only limited acts by a recognised agent while the Advocates Act reserves legal practice to enrolled advocates. Section 33 bars practice by non-advocates, and Section 32 gives the court only a discretionary, case-specific power to allow appearance in a particular matter. A blanket authorisation for present and future litigation amounts in substance to practising law without enrolment, and no special grounds were shown to justify an exception. The request for permission was therefore correctly rejected. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2018 12:42:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272521 A non-advocate power-of-attorney holder has no general right to appear, plead and argue for principals, because Order 3 CPC permits only limited acts by a recognised agent while the Advocates Act reserves legal practice to enrolled advocates. Section 33 bars practice by non-advocates, and Section 32 gives the court only a discretionary, case-specific power to allow appearance in a particular matter. A blanket authorisation for present and future litigation amounts in substance to practising law without enrolment, and no special grounds were shown to justify an exception. The request for permission was therefore correctly rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272521