https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359959 The Court granted permission for urgent circulation in a case where the petitioners challenged an order passed by Respondent No.2, citing lack of jurisdiction and hardship. The Court found prima facie evidence of lack of jurisdiction, expressing confusion over the order's approach. A Notice was issued returnable on a specified date, with ad-interim relief granted. The Court clarified its decision was based on lack of jurisdiction, not the absence of a strike situation, allowing direct service on the same day. en-us Mon, 30 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359959 The Court granted permission for urgent circulation in a case where the petitioners challenged an order passed by Respondent No.2, citing lack of jurisdiction and hardship. The Court found prima facie evidence of lack of jurisdiction, expressing confusion over the order's approach. A Notice was issued returnable on a specified date, with ad-interim relief granted. The Court clarified its decision was based on lack of jurisdiction, not the absence of a strike situation, allowing direct service on the same day. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359959