<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 520 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359956</link>
    <description>The tribunal condoned a delay of 147 days in filing appeals due to negligence on the part of the applicants. Despite acknowledging the negligence, the tribunal emphasized the importance of delivering justice based on merits and decided to allow the appeals to proceed. Each applicant was required to pay a cost of Rs. 10,000 within a specified timeframe as a condition for condoning the delay, ensuring a balance between procedural compliance and substantive justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 08:26:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 520 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359956</link>
      <description>The tribunal condoned a delay of 147 days in filing appeals due to negligence on the part of the applicants. Despite acknowledging the negligence, the tribunal emphasized the importance of delivering justice based on merits and decided to allow the appeals to proceed. Each applicant was required to pay a cost of Rs. 10,000 within a specified timeframe as a condition for condoning the delay, ensuring a balance between procedural compliance and substantive justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>