<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 509 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359945</link>
    <description>Section 14A read with rule 8D cannot be invoked where the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the relevant previous year. Mere investment holdings or a possibility of future exempt income do not by themselves justify a disallowance, because the provision applies only to expenditure incurred in relation to actual exempt income. On that basis, no computation under rule 8D was warranted and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 509 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359945</link>
      <description>Section 14A read with rule 8D cannot be invoked where the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the relevant previous year. Mere investment holdings or a possibility of future exempt income do not by themselves justify a disallowance, because the provision applies only to expenditure incurred in relation to actual exempt income. On that basis, no computation under rule 8D was warranted and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>