<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 496 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for interest expenditure on exempt income but allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance under MAT provisions and the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii). The AO was directed to delete the additions accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 496 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It upheld the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for interest expenditure on exempt income but allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance under MAT provisions and the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii). The AO was directed to delete the additions accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>