<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 493 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that Rule 8D should not apply without establishing a nexus between expenses and exempted income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of recording satisfaction for invoking Section 14A, which the Assessing Officer failed to do. The Tribunal concluded that the AO and CIT(A) overlooked the expenses incurred by the assessee, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2014-15.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 08:24:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 493 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that Rule 8D should not apply without establishing a nexus between expenses and exempted income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of recording satisfaction for invoking Section 14A, which the Assessing Officer failed to do. The Tribunal concluded that the AO and CIT(A) overlooked the expenses incurred by the assessee, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2014-15.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>