<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 48 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12926</link>
    <description>HC held that commission paid to a distributor was deductible under section 37 as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for business. The court ruled commercial expediency is judged from the businessman&#039;s perspective, not the Revenue&#039;s, and the fact that others also benefit does not bar deduction if nexus with business exists. Services by the distributor were accepted, the Tribunal&#039;s allowance was upheld, and both contested questions were decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 48 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12926</link>
      <description>HC held that commission paid to a distributor was deductible under section 37 as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for business. The court ruled commercial expediency is judged from the businessman&#039;s perspective, not the Revenue&#039;s, and the fact that others also benefit does not bar deduction if nexus with business exists. Services by the distributor were accepted, the Tribunal&#039;s allowance was upheld, and both contested questions were decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>