<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 488 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359924</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing credits on various input services and setting aside penalties and demands imposed. It emphasized the importance of demonstrating the business necessity of services for claiming credit and the need for substantial evidence to invoke penalties and extended limitation periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 08:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 488 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359924</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing credits on various input services and setting aside penalties and demands imposed. It emphasized the importance of demonstrating the business necessity of services for claiming credit and the need for substantial evidence to invoke penalties and extended limitation periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>