https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359921 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of services as either 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Service' (CICS) or 'Interior Decorator Service'. The tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellants, involving the supply of materials like mirror panelling and false ceiling based on design specifications, did not align with Interior Decorator Service criteria. Citing relevant case law and definitions, the tribunal concluded that the appellants' services fell under CICS, setting aside the penalty and ruling in favor of the appellants. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2018 08:24:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359921 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of services as either 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Service' (CICS) or 'Interior Decorator Service'. The tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellants, involving the supply of materials like mirror panelling and false ceiling based on design specifications, did not align with Interior Decorator Service criteria. Citing relevant case law and definitions, the tribunal concluded that the appellants' services fell under CICS, setting aside the penalty and ruling in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359921