<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 470 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359906</link>
    <description>The ROM application for rectification of an order was granted as it was found that although a reference was made to Appeal No. E/432/12 in the order, no judgment was issued for it. Consequently, E/432/12 was deleted from the order preamble. The final order confirmed the lower authority&#039;s decision, upholding it and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. As a result, E/432/12 was scheduled for a regular hearing on 18.5.2018 following the rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 08:23:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 470 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359906</link>
      <description>The ROM application for rectification of an order was granted as it was found that although a reference was made to Appeal No. E/432/12 in the order, no judgment was issued for it. Consequently, E/432/12 was deleted from the order preamble. The final order confirmed the lower authority&#039;s decision, upholding it and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. As a result, E/432/12 was scheduled for a regular hearing on 18.5.2018 following the rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>