https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359904 The appellant's appeal was allowed as the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on various grounds, including the applicability of Notification No.67/95-CE for captive consumption, revenue neutrality regarding duty payment, and the application of Rule 4(5)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The demand for duty, penalties, and redemption fines was set aside, with the majority decision supporting the appellant's position based on revenue neutrality and Cenvat credit entitlement. The impugned order was overturned, granting consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 06 May 2018 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359904 The appellant's appeal was allowed as the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on various grounds, including the applicability of Notification No.67/95-CE for captive consumption, revenue neutrality regarding duty payment, and the application of Rule 4(5)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The demand for duty, penalties, and redemption fines was set aside, with the majority decision supporting the appellant's position based on revenue neutrality and Cenvat credit entitlement. The impugned order was overturned, granting consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359904