https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359902 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving differential Central Excise duty on goods not yet manufactured or removed. The demand for duty was deemed unsustainable as it was imposed on goods that had not yet been manufactured or removed from the premises. Additionally, demands related to remnants, under-valuation, and denial of depreciation on imported capital goods were also found unsustainable due to various procedural and substantive reasons. The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original, allowing the appeal and granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per law. en-us Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2018 08:23:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359902 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving differential Central Excise duty on goods not yet manufactured or removed. The demand for duty was deemed unsustainable as it was imposed on goods that had not yet been manufactured or removed from the premises. Additionally, demands related to remnants, under-valuation, and denial of depreciation on imported capital goods were also found unsustainable due to various procedural and substantive reasons. The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original, allowing the appeal and granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359902