<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12921</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee in the case of CIT v. Sholinger Textiles Ltd. The court held that the question referred to them is covered by a previous judgment, and the answer to the question is in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:38:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12921</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee in the case of CIT v. Sholinger Textiles Ltd. The court held that the question referred to them is covered by a previous judgment, and the answer to the question is in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>