https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272497 The Court of Appeal, affirming the trial court's decision, dismissed the appellant's claim for damages and reparation for moral injury due to defamation in a newspaper article. The court found that the evidence presented was inadmissible, and the appellant failed to prove that the publication was defamatory per se. The judgment was upheld by the Privy Council, emphasizing the distinction between "dogmas" and "tenets" in religious matters and ruling in favor of the respondent, resulting in the dismissal of the appellant's claims. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 1934 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 May 2018 17:07:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272497 The Court of Appeal, affirming the trial court's decision, dismissed the appellant's claim for damages and reparation for moral injury due to defamation in a newspaper article. The court found that the evidence presented was inadmissible, and the appellant failed to prove that the publication was defamatory per se. The judgment was upheld by the Privy Council, emphasizing the distinction between "dogmas" and "tenets" in religious matters and ruling in favor of the respondent, resulting in the dismissal of the appellant's claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Oct 1934 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272497